Anchorage School District logo ASD Online -- The Website of the Anchorage School District
Site Index | Site Options | Contact Us
Home | Schools | Departments | About ASD | School Board | myASD

The 92 schools that make up the Anchorage School District are an investment by our community in the education of our children and future generations.

It's important that we maintain the value and quality of that investment. That's what these bonds are about: bringing aged buildings up to current educational standards and providing solid, safe, functional and efficient facilities for our students and educators.

These projects were researched by professional engineers and facility managers, reviewed by citizens on the Capital Request Advisory Committee, and publicly scrutinized and approved by the School Board and Assembly.

A significant amount of State funding is currently available for these bonds, letting us conduct needed construction and repairs with State financial assistance. The reimbursement plan was approved by the legislature in 2002; funding of the plan is subject to annual legislative appropriation.

Like any investment, these projects come at a cost to local taxpayers. Before heading to the voting booth on April 6, please take time to review the improvement projects and weigh their benefits against the cost.

More information on the bond projects is available on this Web site and from our facilities department, 348-5156.

Carol Comeau, Superintendent

School Bond Information, April 6, 2004 Election

Dear Anchorage voters:

Photo of Superintendent Carol ComeauThank you for recognizing the importance of major maintenance in our schools and supporting Proposition 4. Your support allows us to protect the community's investment in school infrastructure and extend the life of our facilities.

While voters supported Proposition 4, most said "no" to Proposition 5, which included school construction projects. I strongly believe in the public process and recognize that this bond package was not the right set of projects at this time. However, our school construction needs have not gone away. Students are still attending crowded, outdated schools.

And while our needs haven't gone away, the offer of State debt reimbursement soon will.

The legislative program that reimburses 60 percent to 70 percent of the total cost of school construction projects ends on December 31, 2004. State debt reimbursement significantly reduces the amount local tax payers spend on these projects. Only projects approved before the end of the year qualify for this program. It would be irresponsible for the district to ignore the benefits of debt reimbursement.

Clearly, Proposition 5 was not acceptable to voters. I hope to find out why voters turned down the proposition. Was the proposition simply too large? Were there individual projects within Proposition 5 that voters felt were important, but others that they felt didn't merit approval? Was debt reimbursement too uncertain? Would voters like to capture the debt reimbursement on some projects by holding a special election in the fall? As always, I want to hear what you have to say. Your input is a critical part of my decision making process and that of the school board. Please give us your suggestions through our Web site or by calling my office at 742-4312.

I have heard the voters on the matter of the district owning an administration building. I have no intention of placing this project on the ballot again. We can still gain efficiencies by consolidating our rented facilities and I'm considering all options. We'll continue to pursue that project and all others that save taxpayers' money and put valuable resources into the classroom.

Most sincerely,
Carol Comeau, Superintendent

(Documents provided here are PDF files and require the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view. PDF icon. )

The Bond proposal package is comprised of:

Pass

Proposition 4 - Repairs, Renewals and Equipment -- $36,380,000

Hammer and saw.
Bond overview
Fail. Proposition 5 - School Renovations, Construction and Site Acquisition -- $95,830,000
Fail Proposition 6 - Administrative and Training Facility -- $30,000,000
Other resources: Map of projects | Frequently asked questions | Projects by school

Local tax impact

Proposition 4

$36,380,000

Repairs, Renewals and Equipment
Estimated annual tax increase for every $100,000 of property value to retire debt:
With State Reimbursement* $5.16
Without State Reimbursement $14.64

Proposition 5

$95,830,000

Major Construction and Renovation
Estimated annual tax increase for every $100,000 of property value to retire debt:
With State Reimbursement* $16.34
Without State Reimbursement $38.56
Estimated annual increase in tax cap for every $100,000 of property value to pay for operation and maintenance costs related to the proposed capital projects $9.79

Proposition 6

$30,000,000

Administrative Facility
Estimated annual tax increase for every $100,000 of property value to retire debt:
With State Reimbursement* $4.83
Without State Reimbursement $12.07

Total–Prop. 4, 5, 6 combined

Estimated ANNUAL tax increase for every $100,000 of property value to retire debt:
With State Reimbursement* $26.33
Without State Reimbursement $65.27

Another way of looking at the cost:

Drawing of a house

For an Anchorage home valued at $215,000, the tax increase to pay for bond debt service and increased operations and maintenance on a MONTHLY basis would be:
With State Reimbursement* $6.47
Without State Reimbursement $13.44

*State Reimbursement is subject to annual legislative appropriation.

 

Use our bond comment box to send comments or questions.If you have comments or questions regarding these bonds, call 907-742-4153 or e-mail us using our Bond comment box

 


More election information
Municipality of Anchorage's election Web page


Anchorage School District logo